No Charge for That: Hiding Millions and Getting Away With It


Wednesday January 30th, 2013   •   Posted by K. Lloyd Billingsley at 7:30am PDT   •   5 Comments

caagseal_square-230x229When we last addressed California’s hidden money scandal, the state’s Attorney General found that the state Parks had concealed only $20.5 million and the remaining $33 million was “simply obscured by long-term complexities in managing that fund.” The AG passed the buck by letting the state Natural Resources Agency decide whether to bring in local law enforcement. Now the Sacramento County District Attorney Jan Scully, a Republican, has declined to bring charges because the Attorney General failed to identify any crime. That made sense on one level.

Governor Jerry Brown had asked the AG, a law-enforcement body, to conduct an “administrative” investigation, like asking the police to make sure a threatened business has all the right permits and signs in place. To “knowingly keep any false account,” is a felony according to section 424 of the state penal code, legal experts told the Sacramento Bee, which broke the hidden money story. If the AG knew about that statute, which may well be doubted, they still declined to file charges. With local law enforcement opting out Parks bosses are considering the case closed. Whoever hid the money got away with it, but the case still has educational value.

Government is clearly unqualified to investigate itself but remains unwilling to let independent investigators see the books. That’s why government employees can hide millions with impunity. One witness told the AG that the money was hidden so the state would not further reduce the Parks Department budget, a perfectly plausible motive. The scandal also revealed that a criminal background is no object to promotion in state government.

Career bureaucrat Manuel Thomas Lopez spent 12 of his 23 years in state government on court-ordered probation for a lengthy list of convictions, including felony drunk driving. But Lopez was duly promoted to deputy of administrative services in the parks department, where he presided over an unauthorized vacation buyout. His boss Ruth Coleman, who would not talk to the AG and has retained an attorney, accused Lopez of hiding the $54 million.

When the story broke Sen. Noreen Evans, Santa Rosa Democrat, wondered how much more “deceit and thievery” was going on in state government. That remains unanswered but prompts another question. California has long been a trendsetter for the rest of the nation. Could such deceit and thievery also be going on in agencies of the federal government, which operates scores of national parks? Odds are we’ll never find out.



5 Responses to “No Charge for That: Hiding Millions and Getting Away With It”

  1. libertarian jerry says:

    Just make sure that at tax time all you California taxpayers pay your “fair share.” Especially Phil Mickelson.

  2. Will Matson says:

    I can see why Queen Victoria said it was good to hang an admiral sometimes. Californian politicians have less conscience than a dead beast.

  3. Jeffrey Christensen says:

    Californians will deduct their self-imposed high state taxes from their taxable income for their Federal Income Taxes. This way, they get the dubious value of the services they vote for themselves in-state, and don’t “pay their fair share” for all the Federal benefits and expenditures they voted for. Fiscally responsible low tax states who don’t have as much taxes to deduct therefore pay disproportionally for a magnitude of government they opposed. The deductions incent politicians to raise taxes at both levels of government.

  4. Robert says:

    Funny, how predominately Democratic states are the ones with the majority of issues and crimes. I guess you can say they are getting what they asked for.

  5. Lorne Marr says:

    Why wasting time “finding out”? Of course such deceit and thievery is also going on in agencies of the federal government. The whole system is breaking apart.

Leave a Comment

Twitter Facebook Youtube RSS

Search


By linking to Amazon.com from this page, The Independent Institute earns referral fees of 4% to 15% from whatever you buy. Bookmark the above link and you can support the Institute when you do your normal shopping!

Seminars
TIR

Categories

January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031