The Multiplier for U.S. Debt Spending


Sunday September 23rd, 2012   •   Posted by Craig Eyermann at 12:42pm PDT   •   4 Comments

How much economic growth does the U.S. get for every new dollar it borrows?

That’s an important question to answer and really, it all comes down to what’s called the multiplier, which can be described as the value of extra economic activity that is generated for every new dollar that is spent, with a multiplier equal to 1.0 indicating that no extra economic activity was generated through the new spending.

In trying to sell President Obama’s “stimulus” plan after he first came into office in 2009, then chief economic adviser Christine Romer said the economic multiplier for the kind of debt-financed spending was 1.57, which means that for every new dollar that the U.S. would borrow to spend, the economy would generate $1.57 in new economic activity.

Did Americans get that kind of return in higher GDP? To find out, we’ve run some numbers covering the period of time since President Obama was sworn into office on January 20, 2009 through June 30, 2012, the end of the most recent quarter for which we have a good estimate of the nation’s GDP.

The United States government has, through June 30, 2012, borrowed some 5.23 trillion U.S. dollars, which has all been spent. Meanwhile, the Gross Domestic Product of the U.S. has only increased by 1.52 trillion dollars in that time, which we’ve measured from December 31, 2008 through June 30, 2012.

So by our math, the average multiplier for the U.S. government’s debt spending during that time is 0.29, far less than the value of 1.0 that would indicate that all this debt-financed government spending had only a neutral effect upon the economy. Put another way, for every $3.43 the U.S. government has borrowed during President Obama’s tenure in office, the nation’s GDP has increased by just $1.00 – a lousy rate of return on the government’s debt-financed “investments”.

Speaking of which, the value of the national debt now exceeds 103% of the nation’s income. On December 31, 2008, that figure was an “affordable” 75.4%.

More on that later....

Featured Image:
Source: Washington State Attorney General


4 Responses to “The Multiplier for U.S. Debt Spending”

  1. libertarian jerry says:

    Its amazing the amount of economic ignorance the average voter has. Why would any one support any politician,of either major party, who tells you that the money the government spends is an “investment,” while the money that the private sector spends is greed. Keynesian economics funded by borrowed fiat currency has been and is now a disaster. Real unemployment in America is hovering around 20% not 8%. Real inflation is about 10% not 2% or 3%, (see John Williams and his researched accurate statistics at Shadow Stats.com),yet the average voter still takes as gospel Government statistics and Main stream Media propaganda. All the fools who vote for the political buffoons who try to centrally plan and run the American Economy, as if it were the old Soviet Union, will wake up one day bankrupt,out of a job,hopelessly in debt. and paying enormous inflated prices for their goods and services. A ruined economy all brought about by the false faith in government keynesian,paper money economics. As if printing more money will stimulate an economy that was bankrupted in the first place by too much paper money,easy credit and misapplied investments. Nothing the government can do will change anything unless the government drastically reins in it’s spending and just gets out of the way. Otherwise its over the fiscal cliff for America.

  2. [...] How much economic growth does the U.S. get for every new dollar it borrows? That’s an important question to answer and really, it all comes down to what’s …www.mygovcost.org/…/the-multiplier-for-u-s-debt-spending/ [...]

  3. Paul Hoffmann says:

    I think gov’t spending begins at -1.0.

  4. Tom says:

    The calculation of 0.29 for the multiplier, while certainly revealing, ignores an equally important measurement which is never calculated. In order for the U.S. government, or any government, to get a dollar to spend, it must first take that dollar from someone who produced it, via direct taxation (theft), or encumber the private production of that dollar from someone via a debt instrument of some sort (a bond). Nobody ever tries to understand or calculate (because it’s essentially impossible) the “lack” of economic return brought about because that dollar (now in the hands of the government via coercive taxation or forced debt) cannot be spent into the economy by the individual or corporate entity that produced it; spent for a reason, and according to the decision, made by the entity that actually owned that wealth. Instead it is usually wasted through expenditures devised by government “workers”, for useless or at least very dubious projects. This creates the additional problem of mal-investment, sending false signals to private manufacturers that, because the government has purchased or wants to purchase something, there must be some sound economic reason to make capital investments necessary in order to produce that which the government wants to buy. When the spending (the boom) finally runs out, then comes the bust, when the economy must then rid itself of all of that mal-investment. Of course, that means loss of jobs and disruption of individual lives as well as the foreclosures and rise in unemployment benefit spending that will occur.

Leave a Comment

Twitter Facebook Youtube RSS

Search


By linking to Amazon.com from this page, The Independent Institute earns referral fees of 4% to 15% from whatever you buy. Bookmark the above link and you can support the Institute when you do your normal shopping!

FF
Seminars
TIR

Categories

September 2012
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30