The IRS has released its first regulations related to how it will determine the penalty tax for not having “affordable” health insurance under ObamaCare.
In those regulations, the IRS projects that the lowest cost “Bronze” plan for health insurance required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) will cost $5,000 for single coverage or $20,000 for family coverage in 2016. For those seeking single coverage, that would represent a decrease of 11% from 2012′s average cost of $5,615, while families would see their cost for health insurance increase by 22% from $15,745. We should note that ObamaCare’s Bronze plan coverage would also be considered a step down in quality from the level of coverage provided by today’s average health insurance plans.
If an individual or family does not have this lowest cost “affordable” health insurance coverage as defined by the PPACA, the IRS will impose a tax, for which the IRS provides several examples of how it will calculate it. Matt Cover of CNSNews discusses the tax that would be imposed on a family of 5 with a joint income of $120,000:
Using the conditions laid out in the regulations, the IRS calculates that a family earning $120,000 per year that did not buy insurance would need to pay a “penalty” (a word the IRS still uses despite the Supreme Court ruling that it is in fact a “tax”) of $2,400 in 2016.
So, this family of 5 would face a choice – they could spend $20,000 for health insurance they might not need or they can pay a tax of $2,400.
Since ObamaCare guarantees that people seeking health insurance will not be denied coverage for pre-existing coverage, and would at most only face a maximum 90 day waiting period from the time they might apply for insurance coverage to the time it goes into effect, the financial incentive for most healthy families will be to drop their health insurance.
Which option do you believe most individuals or families would choose?
I cannot find insurance I can afford now, and I can not afford to pay my cost of living now. How will I afford another $150-200 a month to pay a penalty or tax for not having insurance?
I work for Applebee’s in Toledo, Ohio. The Applebees corporation has decided to cut all of their employees hours to under 29 so they will not be required to pay for their health insurance. Add to this the insurance that is currently offered to non-management staff is going away the end of 2013; leaving all Applebees employees without any option of health coverage. What are people like us supposed to do? We can’t get coverage from our employer and only working part-time can’t afford to buy their own insurance?
I will not comply.
drop the insurance.
All states should nullify.
NULLIFY
NULLIFY
NULLIFY
I don’t think you need to be a rocket scientist to figure out the answer to this one.
Unbelievable!
Their regulation doesn’t address what will happen to my HSA-compatible policy, which only costs me $520/year in premiums, not including my tax-free donations to the HSA. The high-deductible REAL catastrophic-only insurance policies should be the lowest level, even setting aside the moral questions of having an individual mandate.
I love the last 3 paragraphs of the article, which point out that there is no way the actual provisions of this law support the premise that the goal was to make sure everyone has insurance. Access to catastrophic care, maybe, but at what cost? It WILL bankrupt every private insurance company eventually, or turn them into government contractors with guaranteed monopolies and bailouts, and Obama has actually stated before running for President that that was his goal.
[...] Craig Eyermann of the Independent Institute writes, [...]
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
[...] View full post on MyGovCost | Government Cost Calculator [...]