How can the government increase the amount of money it collects in taxes without increasing tax rates? Or rather, for politicians looking to remain as blameless as possible when their constituents get their new, higher tax bills, how can they make it look like they’re not increasing taxes when they’re taking more in taxes?
Here, Damian Paletta of the Wall Street Journal provides the answer being considered by the commission President Obama established to propose solutions for eliminating the annual federal government budget deficit by 2015, which turns out to involve doing away with popular tax breaks like the mortgage interest deduction and child tax credits:
Sacrosanct tax breaks, including deductions on mortgage interest, remain on the table just weeks before the deficit commission issues recommendations on policies to pare back with the aim of balancing the budget by 2015.
The tax benefits are hugely popular with the public but they have drawn the panel’s focus, in part because the White House has said these and other breaks cost the government about $1 trillion a year.
At stake, in addition to the mortgage-interest deductions, are child tax credits and the ability of employees to pay their portion of their health-insurance tab with pretax dollars.
It’s rather alarming to read that the government views the relief it provides income earners from its imposed taxes as being such a huge cost. “Why, if not for these trillion-dollar tax breaks we’re giving away,” they seem to argue, “we would have a balanced budget!” Then again, as far as the government is concerned, it’s not really your money that you earned through your work to make your life and your family’s lives better. It’s the government’s money, and they know better than you how to spend it.
The good news is that the MyGovCost calculator considers this approach to sticking taxpayers with higher tax bills, without being taxed at higher rates. The calculator already assumes that anyone earning more than $250,000 per year will see any tax breaks they might have today above that level disappear altogether. The calculator also assumes that even though tax rates are likely to rise, the value of tax breaks that would otherwise increase in step with those higher tax rates will instead be frozen at current levels, increasing the impact to individuals on at least two different levels.
The only problem is that even with those changes, the federal government still won’t be able to balance its budget, because the spending that they know better than you how to do will go up even more!
Excellent!!! End the tax credit on interest! The outcomes are both good and bad, with the end result being good. First, there shouldn’t be tax breaks. If we’re going to have a tax, let’s at least pretend that “all men are created equal”, and make everyone pay the same amount. Why should the home owner get a break that he who does not own a home doesn’t get? Here’s the short term ‘bad’; Congress can’t figure out why the banks aren’t loaning now? They want to lower interest even further to “stimulate” It should be fun to watch when the only incentive to keep from paying off that loan goes away.
So what’s the long-term good? Glad you asked. The sooner we can crash this monetary system, the sooner we can get on the track to recovery, and we need proposals like this one to get it moving. The sooner we get to the ledge, the sooner we can throw them off...
I think the government should have to publish their budget. Banks should not be able to charge the government interest on borrowed money. Yes, the banks will quit loaning the government money. Then, the government might actually have to “operate within their means”. It’d be a shame if the banks didn’t continue to get rich off of the incompetence of our politicians and thus continue taking our hard-earned tax money.
I agree with Joe4liberty: Due away with all tax-breaks and loop-holes. You want to have children? It’s expensive. Be prepared to pay for it. You want to run a business? You have money put away and are drawing interest from it? There are so many abuses of our system. I still say that if an American business moves out of the country, ban them from importing. That will help prevent job losses due to the greed of big business.
How much money is paid out in Earned Income Credit each year?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Whenever the government raises taxes on businesses, the business must raise its prices in order to stay in business and, therefore, the consumer—the worker—IS taxed by higher prices. What would make sense to me is doing away with what is coined, “Earned Income Tax Credit”, a large “refund” check going to people who did not earn the money. They receive the money from the United States Treasury that other people earned and it suffers serious widespread abuse, not that it is not organized thievery and an additional, federally appropriated, welfare program already. Most of the families claiming the “credit” are also claiming state welfare assistance at the same time. Whenever anything is taxed, we get less of it—business owners, (job-providers), worker’s, and, thereby, production. It is the main reason why this society of people is in the trouble that it is in.